If you are a developing Asian state, the answer apparently seems to be ‘yes’. This has been suggested as a strategy for Asian countries in achieving their research and development goals. Resources for scientific research, whether undertaken in universities or in the private sector, should be carefully allocated and targeted towards specific areas for priority development.
Here is well-known international higher education academic Philip Altbach writing about China and India back in 2001:
One strategy available to China and India is targeting specific areas for intensive research and development investment. These areas are generally in fields that can directly benefit the economy and that build on existing strengths in the country.
And here’s another academic, William Cummings, on the growth of a new academic centre in the Asia-Pacific region in 2010:
An interesting line of speculation is that the different academic systems of the Asia-Pacific region might develop distinctive directions of excellence in the decades ahead… China is notable for its achievements in space and in computer-related areas. The Philippines is known for its training of doctors and other health personnel. An infusion of increased resources might allow the country to gain prominence in the health-related sciences.
In recognition of the recent Day of Science in Kyrgyzstan, President Almazbek Atambayev is also weighing in:
Science is of paramount importance in the formation of human capital that is an important factor in accelerating social and economic development of any country. In Kyrgyzstan, it is necessary to concentrate the whole scientific potential on priority directions for the country.
Three narratives from the last 15 years, all suggesting concentration and specialization in some form or another. I think this raises interesting questions around:
- defining national research/science priorities in an interconnected and interdependent world
- the benefits and drawbacks of focussing investment in a small number of fields vs sharing resources more widely, if also more thinly
- the relative weight placed on economic development vs social development
- whether this push towards concentration is visible in other regions of the world
- the role that universities can play either in supporting government policy or developing their own priorities drawing on their local, national and global networks
Altbach, Philip, “Gigantic Peripheries: India and China in the International Knowledge System,” in Hayhoe, Ruth and Pan, Julia (eds), Knowledge Across Cultures, 2001, pp. 199-214.
Cummings, William. “Is the Academic Centre Shifting to Asia?” In David Chapman, William Cummings and Gerard Postiglione (eds.) Border Crossing in East Asian Higher Education (Hong Kong: Comparative Education Centre, University of Hong Kong and Springer Press, 2010), 47-76.
Manasova, Kanykei, “Almazbek Atambayev: We have to concentrate all scientific potential on priority directions for country”, 24.kg, 10.11.2015, accessed from http://www.eng.24.kg/community/177917-news24.html